AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Bild to gcode5/2/2023 ![]() When i set all four settings to 0.15mm i get some and when setting to 0.1mm i get all of the missing etching paths. I already tried to set the stop-masks to zero so that there is no greater border around the objects but that doesn't help. So maybe i misunderstand the settings but when i set my tool size to 0.2mm and the wanted isolation to 0.2mm than why isn't there an isolation patch between these pads/wires? Now the problem is that at positions where the space is only marginal greater than 0.2mm i have no etching patch inbetween. I created a simple test layout just for this which has everywhere more than 0.2mm space between all pads and wires. The wanted result is that i have only one etching path around the pads and wires. Now i have a little problem with the settings in pcb-gcode for the width of the isolation path.įor my tests i set "Default" "Maximum" and "Step size" isolation settings and "Etching Tool Size" to the same value of 0.2mm. ![]() I try to convert a simple test layout to g-code for experimenting with my self build cnc.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |